Back to case studies

Data Visualization

Non-Tariff Measures and Household Welfare: Evidence from Ghana

NTMs are a double-edged sword, offering both protection and challenges for household welfare.

Background

Non-tariff measures (NTMs) such as quality standards, import restrictions, and certification requirements are increasingly shaping agricultural trade in Ghana. While these measures aim to protect consumers and stabilize markets, they can also impose costs on households by influencing food prices and availability. Understanding how NTMs affect household welfare is critical for designing policies that balance trade regulation with poverty reduction. The broader challenge is that NTMs have complex ripple effects. They can improve food safety and market stability, but they may also raise costs for producers and consumers. Poor households are particularly vulnerable to price increases, while wealthier households may benefit from improved quality. This study situates NTMs within the broader discourse on trade policy and household welfare, highlighting both benefits and risks.

Research Approach

Household survey data was combined with trade policy records to assess the impact of NTMs on welfare indicators such as consumption, expenditure, and nutrition. Econometric models were applied to measure both direct and indirect effects of NTMs on household welfare. The analysis controlled for income, location, and demographic factors to isolate the effects of NTMs. Comparative scenarios were modeled to assess differences between households exposed to NTMs and those less affected. This dual approach ensured findings were both statistically rigorous and contextually grounded.

Key Findings

  • NTMs influenced household food expenditure patterns.
  • Poor households faced higher vulnerability to price increases.
  • Wealthier households benefited from improved food quality.
  • NTMs had mixed effects on nutrition outcomes.

Implications

  • Policymakers should design NTMs with poverty-sensitive safeguards.
  • Organizations can use evidence to advocate for balanced trade policies.
  • Businesses must adapt to regulatory environments while protecting consumers.

Client Benefit

For organizations, this research informs advocacy and program design. For policymakers, it highlights the need for inclusive trade regulation. For businesses, it shows how compliance with NTMs can enhance competitiveness while managing risks.

Conclusion

NTMs are a double-edged sword, offering both protection and challenges for household welfare.

Institutions Involved

  • University of Ghana – Department of Agricultural Economics
  • Journal of International Development – Editorial consortium

Compliance & Attribution

Martey, E., et al. (2024). Non-tariff measures and household welfare: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of International Development.